14
No Comments

Dangers of Division 7A Loans In Liquidation

By Ashley Muscat, Law Clerk at Matthews Folbigg Lawyers in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group

It is common for associates and shareholders of companies in Australia to withdraw company funds through a loan account. There are lots of tax reasons why this is a popular way to access profits from a corporate vehicle. Of course, the ATO knows this, and so if the loan is not properly documented and does not satisfy the criteria to be a Division 7A loan, the amount will be deemed to have been paid out as a dividend, and taxed in the hands of the shareholder, usually unfranked. [...]  READ MORE →

Law and Justice , Legality concept, Judge Gavel, Law book and Scales of Justice on a black wooden background, law library concept.
No Comments

Dotting the I’s, and crossing the T’s – the perils of creditors statutory demands

By Jeffrey Brown a Solicitor of Matthews Folbigg, in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

The slightest slip of the pen can lead to disastrous consequences when you are dealing with creditors statutory demands, as a recent Supreme Court case demonstrates.

VO Group Australia Pty Limited (“VO”) was making an application to set aside a statutory demand that had been issued on it by Watpac Construction Pty Limited (“Watpac”).  Watpac in turn alleged that the application was made outside the 21 day time limit for making such an application and was invalid. [...]  READ MORE →

9
No Comments

Challenging Demands

By Jacob Reardon a Solicitor of Matthews Folbigg, in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

Section 459G(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (“the Act”) allows a debtor company served with a statutory demand to apply to the Court to have it set aside. Under s 459G(2) any such application must be filed within the 21 day statutory limitation period. This is a strict 21 days and generally cannot be extended.

The operation of s 459G and the strict 21 days limit has led to some controversy in situations where a debtor company has been served with a statutory demand, but does not become aware of the service until after the expiry of the 21 day period. How could it file an application to set aside a demand it did not know about? [...]  READ MORE →

Law and Justice , Legality concept, Judge Gavel, Law book and Scales of Justice on a black wooden background, law library concept.
No Comments

Standing to Stay?

By Aritree Barua, Solicitor at Matthews Folbigg Lawyers

Once a company has been wound up, it can be very difficult (but by no means impossible) to undo or even temporarily halt the winding up process. Only those with proper standing may even attempt such a feat.

In Sebie v ENA Development Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (Receiver Appointed), in the matter of ENA Development Pty Ltd [2023] FCA 2, the Federal Court of Australia (“the FC”) rejected an application made by Mr Robert Sebie (“Mr Sebie”) for a stay of the winding up of ENA Development Pty Ltd (“ENA”). [...]  READ MORE →

1
No Comments

My Bankruptcy (That Never Was)

By Jacob Reardon a Solicitor of Matthews Folbigg, in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

A bankrupt may apply to the Court under section 153B of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (“the Act”) to have the bankruptcy annulled. With some exceptions, the effect of an annulment is to place the bankrupt back in the position as if there had been no bankruptcy. Most annulments occur following a sequestration order obtained by a creditor – for instance where the debtor was simply unaware of the petitioning creditor’s debt, can pay the debt and is otherwise solvent (an expensive process but perfectly achievable with good advice). [...]  READ MORE →

anonymous People standing and walking on a trade show booth, generic background with a blur effect applied
No Comments

Fighting the Wolf at the Door

By Jacob Reardon a Solicitor of Matthews Folbigg, in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

Under section 467(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (“the Act”) the Court has discretion in a winding up application to:

  • Dismiss the application with or without costs, even if a ground on which the Court may order a company to be wound up is proved; or
  • Adjourn the winding up application hearing conditionally or unconditionally; or
  • Make any interim order it thinks fit.

In exercising its discretion, the Court’s attention will be directed to the public interest which usually dictates, in the absence of special circumstances, that an insolvent company be wound up to prevent it from incurring further debts.

In Reform Projects Pty Ltd v Macarthur Projects Pty Ltd [2022] NSWSC 672, Parker J (“Macarthur Projects”) considered an application to have the defendant company (“Macarthur”) wound up in insolvency after it had failed to comply with a statutory demand served by the plaintiff company (“Reform”). [...]  READ MORE →

Judge gavel with Justice lawyers, Businessman in suit or lawyer working on a documents in courtroom. Legal law, advice and justice concept.
No Comments

Creditor Bankruptcy Notices: What do I do if I receive one?

Creditor Bankruptcy Notices: What do I do if I receive one?

By Tiani Kasbarian, a Law Clerk of Matthews Folbigg, in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group

What is a Bankruptcy Notice?

The Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) refers to a bankruptcy notice as a formal warning that is issued to a debtor who owes a creditor a minimum of $10,000 or more. This amount was permanently raised from $5,000 in January 2021.

The Notice requires a debtor to pay an amount within 21 days from the date it has been served. If they do not resolve the debt, the subject of the Notice within that 21 day period, the debtor has committed an ‘act of bankruptcy’, which the applicant creditor may rely upon in order to apply to the court for a sequestration order to be made against the debtor’s estate. [...]  READ MORE →

8
No Comments

Till Debt Do Us Part: Family Law and Corporate Insolvency

By Jacob Reardon a Solicitor of Matthews Folbigg, in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

Under section 1337H of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (“the Act”), a Court exercising Federal or State Jurisdiction can transfer a civil proceeding arising under the Act to another Court with appropriate jurisdiction where it considers that it is in the interests of justice to do so. What about where the defendant directors to an insolvent trading claim have commenced family law proceedings between themselves? [...]  READ MORE →

9
No Comments

Get out of (Liability) Gaol Free under section 447A

By Jacob Reardon a Solicitor of Matthews Folbigg, in our Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

Section 447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (“the Act”) enables the Court to make such orders as it thinks appropriate as to the operation of Part 5.3A of the Act. Since its introduction, the Courts have adopted an expansive construction of the provision and have liberally applied the power in a variety of contexts. Accordingly, the provision has become something of a panacea for multiple ills in the context of voluntary administration and has been used in various instances among others to: [...]  READ MORE →

1
No Comments

Do you want to continue litigation against a party declared bankrupt? The Federal Court of Australia provides insight in Yan v Spyrakis as trustee in bankruptcy for Liu [2022] FCA 872

By Aritree Barua, Solicitor at Matthews Folbigg Lawyers.

In Yan v Spyrakis as trustee in bankruptcy for Liu [2022] FCA 872 (“Yan v Spyrakis”), the Federal Court of Australia (“FCA”) re-stated the principles to be applied when considering whether to continue litigation against a party that has been declared bankrupt.

Background

Mr Liu (“the Bankrupt”) was made bankrupt on 11 November 2011 on his own petition. At the time of his bankruptcy, there were proceedings pending in the Supreme Court of New South Wales (“the Supreme Court proceedings”) in which the Bankrupt and a number of related companies were the defendants and Mr Yan was the plaintiff. [...]  READ MORE →

Judge gavel with Justice lawyers, Businessman in suit or lawyer working on a documents in courtroom. Legal law, advice and justice concept.
No Comments

Replacing a Trustee of a Bankrupt Estate

By Aritree Barua, Solicitor at Matthews Folbigg Lawyers

If you are concerned about the appointment of a trustee of a bankrupt estate, or you have a disagreement with a trustee, or a trustee has decided to retire, you may be able to replace that trustee. This article explores various ways in which you can replace a trustee of a bankrupt estate.

Replacing a trustee by resolution at a creditors’ meeting

If you are a creditor, you can remove and replace a trustee of a bankrupt estate by way of a resolution at a creditors’ meeting (Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (“the Bankruptcy Act”), Schedule 2 (“the Insolvency Practice Schedule”), section 90-35(1)). Notice of the meeting must be provided to all persons who are entitled to receive notice at least 5 business days before the meeting (Insolvency Practice Schedule, section 90-35(2)). [...]  READ MORE →

Law and Justice , Legality concept, Judge Gavel, Law book and Scales of Justice on a black wooden background, law library concept.
No Comments

Judgment Debts – The Consequences for a Judgment Debtor

By Jamieson Naylor, Law Clerk at Matthews Folbigg in the Insolvency, Restructuring and Debt Recovery Group.

Becoming a judgment debtor, that is, having a judgment entered against you, can be quite an unsettling notion. However, judgment debtors should resist the urge to ignore a judgment creditor. There are a number of options open to a judgment debtor and it is important that judgment debtors should take steps to deal with a judgment debt as soon as possible. If a court or tribunal has entered judgment in favour of a judgment creditor, then the judgment creditor can enforce that judgment against a person known as a “judgment debtor”. The person with the benefit of the judgment is known as a “judgment creditor”. [...]  READ MORE →